Optional@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 15 days agoEighteenlemmy.worldimagemessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up11.34Karrow-down117cross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageEighteenlemmy.worldOptional@lemmy.world to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square161fedilinkcross-posted to: housing_bubble_2@lemmy.world
minus-squareSarmyth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up49arrow-down1·15 days agoThey vote on it rather frequently. They do at the moment but it does waffle a bit.
minus-squareNJSpradlin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down4·15 days agoThe last vote had a very huge abstention ‘vote’, which was the only reason the ‘for’ vote out performed the ‘against’.
minus-squareCaptain Aggravated@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·14 days agoIf “no vote” was a candidate I don’t think we would have had a president since Jefferson.
They vote on it rather frequently. They do at the moment but it does waffle a bit.
The last vote had a very huge abstention ‘vote’, which was the only reason the ‘for’ vote out performed the ‘against’.
If “no vote” was a candidate I don’t think we would have had a president since Jefferson.
Now that’s an idea.