• streetlights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) sought a lead cyber security expert and advertised annual pay of £41,935

    That’s fucking shocking. And after they can’t fill that role they’ll bring in a contractor and pay 4 times as much.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      The German equivalent did the same. The list of requirements was as long as an arm or two. from memory: The person should be a team leader with 10+ years of experience, know Windows, MacOS and Linux, networking, security, hacking, etc, pp, and have knowledge of the legal issues regarding this stuff on top of the technical knowledge to boot.

      They offered ~€2500/month. Some guy with a company in that business said that he would rent out someone with that level of knowledge (minus the legal stuff) for more than that per day.

      They pulled the ad after a few months.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I know people who earn more than that working 4 days a week as a bank clerk. It seems to be universal of governments all over the world doesn’t it.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      A part of me thinks it’s low on purpose so the only candidates that apply are doing it for ideological reasons, and aren’t motivated by money (thus opening them up to risk of being bought by a foreign agency). Who knows, maybe it would be revealed their salary would quadruple after they get the job.

      But the likelihood is that their budgets are low and can’t compete with the private sector.

      • streetlights@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        People on low salaries are exactly the sort of people who would be vulnerable to being bribed by foreign adversaries.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah I realise that, that’s why I thought about maybe the advertised salary might not necessarily be the truth and they do get decent compensation to reduce the chance of them getting compromised due to financial reasons.

          • cook_pass_babtridge@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Or, if they’re a foreign agent being paid by another state, they’ll be at the front of the queue of applicants because they don’t mind the uncompetitive pay.

      • Whelks_chance@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was thinking the same. This will attract people who are essentially independently wealthy, and so don’t actually need this income. Which adds a nice classism based barrier to entry too.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What do you reckon that it’ll be the same individual they would have hired but who was savvy enough to wait for them to hire the contractor?

      Also I’m off to go study being a cyber security contractor

      • SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The US does pay significantly higher, but with enormous costs (afaik).

        My senior full stack engineer position would be about 60k/year at the government, which is a significant income to Dutch standaards.

        My monthly costs are around 1400 per month, the rest used for savings and fun.