I draw the concept, or write down the formula or even a sentence, on a shared board/screen etc. So I can clearly show my understanding and check where the other person understanding is different.

It means that we have to work together to come to a common understanding.

I cannot read the article, but a part of me wishes that the USA forces Europe to become more indipendent.

Huawei was cut off with all the tariffs and was hit hard, but now they came back stronger than before, and this time around USA cannot hit them anymore:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMFdYFmeiBA

There is no need to express opinions when we have good estimates for both your questions:

Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? -> https://ourworldindata.org/ghg-emissions-by-sector

individual solutions reviewed and assessed by Project Drawdown, including their relevant sector(s) and their impact on reducing heat-trapping gases -> https://drawdown.org/solutions/table-of-solutions

Both the links above are from a very interesting video on the topic that I suggest to take a look at. Also the whole channel is really interesting and well done -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReXaS4QausQ

Wow, this is visionary.

What are your interests?

In the meantime you could follow a couple of communities is where people share interesting videos:

• !peertube@lemmy.world

• !peertube@lemmy.wtf

(thanks @asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev for the correction)

The letter is from 30 associations among which the one of the website I linked. Try to contact them

Also I drive a van and I think it’s cool since obviously I’m cool and so my car kinda has to be, too, so I’m not sure if I agree with your first point

sorry, my mistakes. Vans can be absolutely cool. I think the electric one from VW is extremely cool. It’s just not the kind of cool that people with fragile masculinity would desire

In Copenhagen, meteorologists predict the city will receive 30% more rainfall by the end of this century.

Oh shit

EuroNCAP suggested to try to change something, apparently they are not catching in their test, but they acknowledge the issue

https://etsc.eu/calls-grow-to-address-safety-risks-of-large-vehicles-in-urban-areas/

Euro NCAP calls upon the vehicle industry to improve the vehicle crash compatibility of future models and not to accept settling for the status quo. It believes Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier testing can help manufacturers engineer their cars and vans to better protect occupants in the event of a head-on collision

But is it an unethical car? It fits a lot of stuff or a lot of people or a fair amount of both, but I guess the same thing is true for the f150. Visibility is much better I guess, but would pick ups be more moral if they had a lower hood?

some thoughts about your post

• nobody would buy a van if not in need, because it’s not cool, it costs more etc. So you would end up having less big vehicles on the road. There is no need to regulate too much something that is numerically not important
• the hood height for the van is lower and visibility is better: you can find a lot of studies that connect the former with less killings and less serious injuries and the latter with less collisions, so definitely less dangerous
• i actually think that if pickups had lower hoods, they would be more moral, yes, because they would be less dangerous. (see above)

Slow down your love: this is just a proposal from a bunch of associations. On the other side there are car industry lobbies and their enormous profit margins, which are particularly strong. Let’s see what happens

Unrequested suggestion:

Lemuroid emulator + apotris is the best (FOSS) tetris replacement on Android

What are you talking about? That neve happened!

Very cool!

I’m wondering how long until Bluesky locks down its users

So cars jump over the garden?

That’s the community I cross-posted from, actually 😁

È un articolo ben scritto ed interessante, comunque di tratra di attualità.

Mods please non rimuovere 😛

I’m aware of this and agree but:

• I see that asking how an LLM got to their answers as a “proof” of sound reasoning has become common

• this new trend of “reasoning” models, where an internal conversation is shown in all its steps, seems to be based on this assumption of trustable train of thoughts. And given the simple experiment I mentioned, it is extremely dangerous and misleading

• take a look at this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xx4Tpsk_fnM : everything is based on observing and directing this internal reasoning, and these guys are computer scientists. How can they trust this?

So having a good written article at hand is a good idea imho

High voltage contact shirt. You touch me, you fry

There are plenty of cities around the world with downtowns closed to cars, and a lot of thriving stores.

There are solutions, this is not an excuse to to allow cars in city centers