Manufacturers now have to deliver security updates …

Does this apply to new devices, or past ones too?

Is there a company or delivery size above that this applies and below not? Or would this apply to small manufacturers trying to produce or establish their first product too?

I didn’t add a star at the end for the word search, so at least for that example, the sarcastic ones were all ‘amazingly’ and consequently not counted, and the ‘amazing’ at the end seems literal. I haven’t looked at any other cases, though.

A Python-specific question is better suited to the !python@programming.dev community instead of the general programming one.

Glad you’re so appreciative and worked through it! I gladly share, discuss, and respond.

I’ll have to read up on palette filters. :) I do semi-regularly use ffmpeg, but palette filters are not something I have heard or used before.

I assume in this case it’s a downsampling into fewer colors, evading the issues of almost-same-colors?

Especially given the last square/check pattern makes me thing of codecs splitting into square blocks and then encoding those. It could make sense that this division leads to different results for one reason or another, which then produces a check pattern without it being there before.

For comparison, “amazing” occurs six times.

Only one of them barely reaching 200. For the size of the Linux kernel I find these numbers surprisingly low.

I don’t see a sharp drop as a sign of corporate oversight at all.

Stuff may be tackled en-batch. Or individuals can care. Or it can be an organic team decision or effort.

1, 2, 4, 5, 6 all look fine resized in the post and full size

3 looks fine full size but has slight visual artifacts resized in the post (check/square pattern)

I can barely see it on my monitor. So on worse monitors it may not even be visible. #272a31 vs #262b31

animated webp may also be an option

The screenshot is from my desktop with wide enough screen on Lemmy web (programming.dev).

The issue is one of scaling.

When I open the image without being resized into the website layout, it has the following visual pattern:

When I zoom out to 50% it looks (almost?) fine

Did you scale the source with ffmpeg? Do you have a visual pattern in your console background? The simplest solution would be to have a solid color as background. The second best to render a small enough size that it does not get resized in the browser.

At 1920x1038, it’s very big right now. I’m surprised the font is big enough to be readable. I assume you scaled it up or have a high dpi display resulting in this.

I’ll use a gif with each frame being a different country flag. Then I can access them by frame index.

That visual pattern compression though

Let’s call the axes g o and d.

Is that yours? I would suggest adding some spacing to paragraphs and headlines. And improving contrast and coloring on the page and git subsite to improve readability and accessibility. Personally, I would also ensure nav menu items do not move while moving cursor over them.

You think Ukraine is trying to launder money? Or who is?

How do you conclude from unrealistic demands to no interest in peace?

What do you think the prospects of short and long-term peace are? What would you be willing to sacrifice for temporary “peace”?

They probably know better than us. No?

That’s very political of you.

I fixed a slowness issue so you might see the instance get quicker but if it still bad let me know.

I’m seeing quite slow response times / page loading right now. Seems like it does have some variance between normal/acceptable and very slow.

Marketing-speak, not saying much at all. Not even a hint in what they “discovered”, what they plan to change, or plan to do. No acknowledgement of previous issues, making me doubt the “working with the incredible global community” as pure marketing-speak.

Roman @rtsisyk revoked Github owner permissions from Alexander @biodranik and Viktor @vng and granted such permissions to the community contributor @pastk. This triggered Github’s automatic “sanctions” check and the whole Github OM organization was automatically archived and admin access was blocked until OM’s appeal was reviewed. It was unknown whether and when Github would review Organic Maps’ appeal and unblock the repositories, so 2 weeks later the project migrated to the self-hosted git.omaps.dev/organicmaps instance, using the free and open source software forge Forgejo.

What the fuck? GitHub blocking the account because of automated security evaluation triggering (probably a good thing) but no review over two weeks (obviously a very bad thing)?

What are you referring to? The reasons to fork, what a fork/forking process is, or what it means for this project?

Contributors disagreed with how the project was run and controlled. They committed to run their own project based on the other project. With more collaborative ownership and governance.