cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ndlug.org/post/1001830

Today, we’re happy to announce the launch of the 2GB Raspberry Pi 5, built on a cost-optimised D0 stepping of the BCM2712 application processor, and priced at just $50.

The new D0 stepping strips away all that unneeded functionality, leaving only the bits we need. From the perspective of a Raspberry Pi user, it is functionally identical to its predecessor: the same fast quad-core processor; the same multimedia capabilities; and the same PCI Express bus that has proven to be one of the most exciting features of the Raspberry Pi 5 platform. However, it is cheaper to make, and so is available to us at somewhat lower cost. And this, combined with the savings from halving the memory capacity, has allowed us to take $10 out of the cost of the finished product.

So, while our most demanding users — who want to drive dual 4Kp60 displays, or open a hundred browser tabs, or compile complex software from source — will probably stick with the existing higher memory-capacity variants of Raspberry Pi 5, many of you will find that this new, lower-cost variant works perfectly well for your use cases.

  • Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t see any reason to use a Raspi instead of an used thin client for selfhosting.
    They use about the same energy, but the Mini-PC has x86, which has better software support, has more ports, and runs more stable.

    I have a RPI for my 3D-printer (Octoprint), and I will soon replace it with a “proper” PC, because it always crashes.

    Raspberry Pis are good for very small appliances, but for anything more, they suck imo

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are what you make of them. I have three 3b+ units sitting upstairs, one of which runs my entire media stack, and the second is mostly just for Pihole, and the last is for general tinkering I might need. The pin array is awesome to have.

      No one’s arguing they are low performance (although a 5 is practically 5x the performance of a 3b+ unit), but they definitely don’t suck

      • Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t even mean performance in terms of computing power.

        RPIs are, imo, not meant as a server. It might (and will) work fine, but one of the main problems I have is the power supply. As soon as I send a more advanced print job to my RPI, it crashes. Even though I have the official power cord.

        If it works for you - fine! I don’t want to tell badly about them. They are great.

        It’s just that they are very inflexible.

      • Guenther_Amanita@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A small form factor PC. Think of a Mac Mini. Small, often not-high-performance, low-powered PCs that are often used in business environments.

        I use one as my home server.

        • pbjamm@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          that is not a thin-client in the traditional sense, just a small form factor (1liter) pc. Thin clients were minimal spec machines that were made to connect to a much more powerful server somewhere on the network that did all the work. The thin client handled the display and I/O.

          Mini PCs are generally a far better deal than a Pi and much more powerful for any kind general computing use.

        • ghurab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s not what a thin client, that’s just a mini PC. A thin client is a computer that connects to remote sessions, and since that’s their main function, they’re they don’t need more computing power than you need to connect to a report desktop environment.