• m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    On the other hand, if you use an old technology that isn’t being mass produced anymore, it can reach a point where it will become a big liability for a mission-critical piece of equipment.

    • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think there was something about the US government having to finally get rid of vacuum tubes because the only suppliers were in Russia.

    • Mpatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yah this is bad I run a cnc plasma table, big table 10 feet x 20 feet. It uses floppy disks. Pain in the ass to find a new drive and pain in the ass to find new disks because constant write re write emf and metal dust kills them. But despite that it’s still cheaper and easier than a $15k retro fit to a more modern controler.

      • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        If it works well for the job

        Your example is one where it clearly isn’t a great fit for the job. If you wanted to transfer sensitive data discretely, a floppy could be significantly better than a wired network where you’ve got to worry about America/Russia/China/Israel/Iran and who knows who else peeping on the transfer, or a USB drive which is already known to be compromised by stuxnet derivatives.