• BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If your claim were accurate, they wouldn’t have to resort to putting ads on websites that are subscription based.

    Unless you want to make the argument they’re just greedy bastards, which then means your first argument is bull, because they were already greedy bastards enshittifying it all well before adblockers were even close to commonplace.

    And again, adblockers even today account for a fraction of users.

    • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      42% is a fraction, but it’s a huge fraction. Higher in some demographics, lower in others.

      If your claim were accurate, they wouldn’t have to resort to putting ads on websites that are subscription based.

      How do you figure? Most business ventures will ask themselves how much a customer would pay for their product. If the answer is lower than enough to make product, they either won’t enter the market or they’ll figure out a way to lower the price. Selling ads is a way to lower the price. Also worth noting that ads used to generate a lot more revenue than they do now.