• Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Back in the day this was even better:

    Original Galaxy S battery was getting weak? Order a new battery from Amazon for 13€. Battery arrives, pop the back of the phone off, pull battery out (just like that, no soldering), push new battery in. Push the back of the phone back on, done.

    New battery in and it had more mAh than the original one. Despite overclocking that phone it ran a day longer after the replacement.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the EU has its way we might all get this.

      One can hope.

      People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

      The battery could power the device wirelessly at this point.

      They could even claim they’re saving the environment by not including the battery after a couple release cycles.

      • XanXic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oof i didn’t think of them selling the battery separate possibly with an upcharge. monkeys paw curls

        • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          You probably also didn’t think about them no longer making the battery two years after releasing the phone.

            • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah but then you have to wade through a million crappy Chinese products and be thankful when they merely don’t hold a charge (as opposed to exploding).

              I’ve been through this back when batteries were replaceable, decent 3rd-party were not easy to find. Best you could hope for was that the original manufacturer kept making them. Nokia went as far as making one battery model work with multiple phone models.

              Honest question, are phone batteries recycleable? Because if there’s going to be a ton of them being made I have to wonder what’s worst for the environment, replacing phones or replacing batteries.

              • moriquende@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not sure if you’re being serious but replacing a phone is the same as replacing a battery, but worse for both consumer and environment. Of course you’d want to do some research before purchasing the first thing that crosses your path, but both me and my wife have done this before many times with very good results.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I had that issue with an Otterbox case. Bought it, it was bulky but protected the phone well. After 3 years the rubber tore near the charging port. They offer “lifetime” warranty (5 years). Well, wrote them for a replacement and they simply said nah, they don’t have that case any more for a phone this “old”. So they didn’t honor the warranty and just told me I’m out of luck.

            What the hell do I buy an expensive phone case for when they can’t even honor a 5 year warranty? That was the last Otterbox for me, Spigen was the choice I went with afterwards. Can’t go wrong with a 10 buck phone case, I don’t care if it breaks in a few years.

            When it comes to phones every manufacturer just gives you the finger if it’s 3+ years old it seems.

            • grue@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              they simply said nah, they don’t have that case any more for a phone this “old”. So they didn’t honor the warranty and just told me I’m out of luck.

              That should’ve been an FTC complaint.

          • gatton@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oooh devious! “We listened to our customers so now all new iPhones will have replaceable batteries.*”

            • Battery not included. Purchase a compatible battery from the Apple store for just $99.99.
      • Lojcs@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        The battery could power the device wirelessly at this point.

        That’s not a thing. Wireless charging is horribly inefficient and produces lots of heat, reducing performance and battery life.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but it is possible.

          Might happen if it has some sort of benefit that we don’t know about for waterproofing separate batteries, even if it is indeed less efficient.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

        Even if it was a legitimate problem, it’s sad that only about half of the phones are certified waterproof even if almost all are sealed.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not that the phones are warrantied against water damage even if they are rated as water resistant.

        • Ado@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            “It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

      • gatton@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol no doubt. Remember when Apple (and other manufacturers I guess) stopped including chargers in the box and they told us it was to reduce waste and was better for the environment? I wonder how many millions of dollars it saved them?

      • kraftpudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the proposal went through. The Deadline is 2027 though. But hopefully, manufacturers will change in preparation of this rule so we maybe see the effects earlier like we saw with usb c? Officially, obligatory usb c usage starts in at the end of 2024, but I think everyone but Apple has already switched and Apple said they’re planning to comply within the time frame.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        About waterproofing: I’ve had to replace a G6’s glass back twice and both times the new cover had the seal pre-installed and the phone could still be cleaned with soap and water, no issue.

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So my consumer preference for a sealed phone with a specific form factor simply doesn’t matter I guess?

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for reminding me of how I used to never worry about battery life cause the moment one got low, I’d just pop a spare out of my backpack and continue on with my day. Batteries were so freaking cheap!

      • ProvableGecko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        You even had official charging stands that had slots for the extra battery so you could charge everything at once overnight

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have an Anker powerbank for that, if my phone ever gets low I just plug it in in my bag.

        Though it never got this far to be honest, my Galaxy S22 lasts for 2+ days (so charging it in the evening for half an hour is usually enough to never worry about battery).

        Bought the powerbank 6 years ago to play Pokemon Go (go figure), but then they removed the steps feature (showing you how far away you are from the Pokemon, leading to people actually hunting them down instead of sitting around in one spot) and I stopped playing (:

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Still, plugging in for an hour or more vs just popping a new battery in n having a full charge instantly is not comparable.

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plugging in is less trouble. You still have to pop open the cover, switch batteries and pop the cover back on. And Android takes like a full minute to boot back up. Just plugging a cable in and waiting for 20-30 minutes is more chill. Or you load it over night when you sleep.

            The only reason why I’d want a swap-able battery would be cheap battery replacement when the old one is giving out :)

            • ZiemekZ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And Android takes like a full minute to boot back up.

              Yeah, I miss my brick Nokia’s quick startup time… I think there’s a way to avoid the shutdown problem.

              1. Hibernation mechanism, known from PCs, could be ported to Android. This way you can pick up where you left off before swapping the battery. Seriously, I hate losing all unread notifications after a reboot. Who the hell though that’s a good idea?
              2. Hot swapping battery, which means that you can change one half of the battery, then the second half and the phone won’t shut down at all. Foldables make it easier since they already use 2 batteries, 1 for each half. Just wire them up in parallel and the voltage won’t drop when one is taken out for replacement by the user.
        • gatton@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I just bought a shoulder bag that has a USB passthrough for this sort of thing. I haven’t put a powerbank inside yet but I plan to. Both mine and my wife’s iPhone 13 batteries are starting to suck bad.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        great for you, doesn’t spund great for the environment, I like the push for replaceable batteries, but surely battery banks are a better solution since they are universal

        • bunnykei@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed for general use, but for people who just replace the entire phone instead of replacing the battery, it will reduce the waste of all the rest of the phone for some time.

        • rasensprenger@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Charging the internal battery from an external one loses a lot of energy, battery charging is very far from 100% efficient A phone might not use enough energy for this to make much of a difference, but you need to build and carry beefier battery banks compared to internal batteries, and I’m not sure whether you’ll see a net benifit

    • gatton@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol this post reads like grandma telling her kids about how phones were in her day!
      “When I was young, we’d just pop the back off the phone and replace the battery ourselves.”
      “Yea yea grandma. Let’s get you to bed.”

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean they’re not wrong tho. This isn’t a I walked up hill both ways to school story. Its meant to convey how crappy companies have become with planned obsolescence.

        • BigNote@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it wasn’t even that long ago either. I feel like I’m talking to teenagers.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        New Fairphones still have that feature.

        But those were also made with repair in mind.

        You can literally replace your usb-c port for 15€ with original parts by yourself, by spending 15 minutes with a screwdriver.

        And the parts of a Fairphone 2 are still available, nearly 8 years after it launched.

    • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There was an even bigger benefit that most people maybe didn’t realise at that time or even now, but when the phone fell that energy got distributed into the parts flying apart, which used to reduce the damage the phone took

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s part of what makes the Noikia 3310 so infamously hard to damage from dropping it, even at extreme heights. It’s designed to come apart on impact instead of staying in one piece and taking the full brunt of the impact.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh god, yeah. My original Galaxy S was dropped a few times and the plastic back cover and the battery flew apart. But the screen never got a scratch, just the plastic had a few small scratches.

        But in general the new glass on phone screen sucks ass. My Galaxy S22 has small scratches from normal use, just being in my pocket. The OnePlus 5 I had before that? Not a single scratch.

        They are making the glass softer now so it doesn’t crack as easily, but at the same time it starts to scratch more. Instead of going with really hard glass that doesn’t scratch and just telling customers to put a case on :-/

          • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, took like a month or so till I realized I already had a very visible scratch on the display. Never dropped, just on the table (display up!) or in my jean pockets. Total insanity :-/

            When you complain about it everyone just tells you to use a screen protector, but they all suck.

            • CurlyChopz@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I wish there was a good screen protector for the ultra but I’ve only heard horror stories about the pen, fingerprint sensor and even camera failing : (

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You pay extra because the materials were sourced through moral means and not sweatshops.

          I for one like that feature.

          • mintyfrog@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do too, but it’s a hard sell for the masses right now. I want Fairphone to succeed but it’s tough.

            Their subscription program is even less competitive.

      • ZiemekZ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I only stick to my Note 9 (peak Samsung) because of stylus support that no one else offers. When Fairphone stars offering as awesome stylus support as Samsung does, I’m moving immediately.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did they make a Fairphone Fold yet? If not then I’m not leaving my Z Fold 3 anytime soon. I regret not waiting for the Pixel Fold…

        • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think they will, any time yet anyway.

          Looking at how my FP3 and the newer FP4 is assembled, I don’t think they can make a foldable and easily repairable device right now (didn’t stop them releasing those unrepairable Earbuds, but oh well)

          There’s also the software aspect too

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did the same with my HTC Thunderbolt. That phone had so many features that these newer “better” phones don’t. Removable battery, expandable storage, IR blaster. That generation was peak for smartphones. Now I just get pixel A’s because they are all the same trash, and at least it’s cheap.

      • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        My Galaxy SIII took soo much abuse before it finally died, when I got it, a friend of mine had already installed CyanogenMod onto it. Best rooted phone I ever owned.

        It was bulletproof in more ways than one, by the time I finally laid it to rest the charging port was broken and I had to charge it by touching wires to the 2 pins meant for a wireless charger, and the phone wouldn’t charge unless it was turned off.

    • Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      just like that, no soldering

      There’s never any soldering involved when replacing batteries tho?

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, could be. Looking it up they mostly use adhesives, custom screws and other crap to stop you from replacing. I could have sworn I heard of a phone where they actually soldered the battery in. Maybe I just made that up though.

    • lazyslacker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The batteries are not soldered even in the newest Samsung phones. Everything you’d want to replace is modular. Not sure about Apple.

      • harpuajim@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My pixel 4a battery isn’t soldered but I needed to spend 45 minutes taking it apart and it’s definitely not something the average phone user would be comfortable doing. We need to pass (in the US) some sort of legislation that makes it simple to replace phone batteries.

    • ZiemekZ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or, better yet, you should be able to hot swap the battery, which means that you can change one half of the battery, then the second half and the phone won’t shut down at all. Foldables make it easier since they already use 2 batteries, 1 for each half. Just wire them up in parallel and the voltage won’t drop when one is taken out for replacement by the user.

    • gigachad@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      But customers want water-proof devices! Therefore we cannot make batteries replacable, it’s not what the market wants you know /s