• Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree and think the core problem of too many guns could be solved the same way other Anglophone nations did it.

    However, your argument was very well written, and I appreciate both its intention and its focus on the human.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m open to a solution, but it’s unrealistic to expect Americans to give/sell back enough of their guns for it to work like it did in Australia.

      We have A LOT more guns here, and each one lasts 100 years or more. We could give up 99% of them (we wouldn’t though) and there would still be like 6 million guns here.

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Demanding people give up their guns would just cause an open civil war. The solution that worked in other countries wouldn’t work here because the ideology is different.

    • Shortstack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have no faith that what has worked in europe would work here given the political and cultural landscape before us. If it was feasible for america I’m not sure we would be in this situation now.

      I wish it was, you and me both, but until that changes I’m simply accepting the lay of the land for what it is and reacting accordingly. We can work towards a better solution in the meantime; these actions and thoughts are not mutually exclusive.

      However, your argument was very well written, and I appreciate both its intention and its focus on the human.

      Thanks for the kind words. It is rather annoying being the change I want to see in the world though.