• Pixlbabble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seriously I’m dumb but wouldn’t it just be transfer of heat? I was joking btw but now I’m invested lol.

        • schroedingershat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You need a temperature gradient to extract energy.

          The water is still cooler than the atmosphere just less than usual.

          It would be a few degrees warmer than deep ocean water, so you could maybe power one of those toy stirling engines with a heat sink near the surface and one deep down, but the amount of usable energy per m^2 would be milliwatts at best.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is a temperature gradient from deep water to shallow, the sterling cycle is just not efficient enough to gain energy with a massive deep-shallow-deep heat pipe system.

            • dudebro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s usually the information I’m looking for.

              Even if the concept works in theory, on practice it may not yield enough magnitude to be useful.