• 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thats why they get the good stuff. Gotta keep the leaders honest with a few riots and manure deliveries to their homes.

          • shifty51@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            From 62 to 64, and they rioted. For comparison Canada retirement age is 65 and many is states is 67. Your statement implies that the French retirement age is an outlier and it’s really not.

          • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “Astronomically”.

            This is like making fun of a fireman using a bucket of water that’s twice as large as your bucket to put out a house fire.

            They pay twice as much in taxes. Vs the ludicrous cost of most basic citizen necessities in the United States .

            Pay twice as much in taxes, you get affordable/basically free healthcare and adorable/basically free higher education(medical school is 2k a year in France). Affordable, reliable long-distance transportation/physical transportation infrastructure, a living and functional social security, but sure. Careful of those taxes you could pay that would cover all basic human necessities plus all major financial concerns until you croak.

            As an example, instead of paying $3,000 in taxes per year, you could pay $6,000 in taxes per year, and you would be free to pursue any education you liked, including medical school, for $1000-$2000 per year instead of paying 30k per year just to learn core classes. Good thing you saved that 3k during tax season.

              • SimplyKnorax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

                I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities.

                • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sounds a lot like “it’s not my problem until it actually affects me personally”.

                  That is, fundamentally, the definition of “my problem”. If I’m not effected, it isn’t my problem, simply by nature of not effecting me. Not exactly sure what point you’re trying to make with it.

                  I don’t know why people want to avoid paying as little taxes as possible when it basically improves the infrastructures/services in their own communities

                  Because I have little interest in community services and infrastructure.

                  • Djeece@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I mean, when you consider the US government spends more (almost twice as much) on healthcare per capita than most countries with free healthcare, you’re literally paying more taxes for it AND you have to shell out 50k$ when something bad happens.

                    Your only argument is “Taxes bad” even when we’re talking about a system that would actually cost less taxes, just because it has a side effect of also helping less fortunate people.

                    How much more egocentric can you get lmao