• Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Haui, that is the problem, there are a lot of browsers, almost 100, out there, but there are only a few decent browsers.
    There is Firefox and Vivaldi, maybe Otter, the three I currently have, but FF and Otther, because of test reasons, due to different engines they use…
    Chrome, EDGE and Opera are Spyware, Brave not very trustworth because of shady relations with Cryptocompanies, a lot of other forks, some not so bad, but very weak in the market.
    No much left.

    • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. The reason for this is market control imo. Chrome is default on chromeos, edge on windows and they’re doing everything they can to make it hard to integrate with other things.

      Actually, it should be outlawed to even install a browser and definitely to recommend one.

      • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Haui, what should be declared illegal is that a private company dominates an essential public space such as the Internet today.Everyone uses the browser that suits them, as a basic tool to access this space. Those who want to protect privacy, avoid using those of these private companies like Google, Microsoft or this Chinese thing.

        Open the rest of the text in a new tab
        https://file.coffee/u/5tHJjZEmLvw7f_g4P_99U.pdf

        • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Absolutely. I agree. There should be a tool to select browsers on every os but none preinstalled.

          The description must come from the makers and sorting can only be done on alphabetical order, last update and number of downloads maybe.

          Have a good one.

            • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, you could see it like that I guess. :D

              But honestly, an app that just shows a repo of browsers (which were virus tested) and downloads one but can itself not be used as a browser should be mandatory for every OS and done.

              • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                @Haui, it’s the same, a repo to download a browser IS a browser, at least it’s engine. Because of this it’s irrelevant if there is a preinstalled browser or a repo dedicated. Also eg the Steam client is a Chromium (bad optimized, slow as hell, in Kiosk mode)
                Apart what will you do, if you want a browser which isn’t in this repo?
                I think it’s easier if the OS include a Browser and everyone is free to use it or use it to download a browser to his like from its official homepage.

                • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  First of all, thanks but I‘m familiar with sysadmin stuff and a (web) browser is not the same as a repo.

                  I‘m talking about something like the appstore that you now have on most OSs. It needs to be open so no single corporation can control it. And it needs to be the same on all OSs for this browser issue (although one could argue it should be the same for everything).

                  And no, I‘m not talking about things that are just not available for windows/linux/macos but aside from that, the ui, sorting should be similar.

                  That way you make it impossible for MS to push edge, for linux to push firefox and for google to push chrome.

                  You visit the appstore and install your browser, then you can go online.

                  • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    @Haui, ok but i still see the advantage there can be
                    How does a repository keep up to date with the 1000 or so existing browsers? Where is it downloaded from and what advantages does it offer compared to downloading it from its official website?
                    In Android there is the Play Store with dubious security and with many apps retouched and cutted off by Google, eg the app Blokada isn’t the same as Blokada from F-Store or the original .apk in the Website. In Windows I avoid the Store for same reasons

                  • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    @Haui, You cannot prevent an OS from modifying a Store according to its own interests, with which we arrive at the same thing that could only accept a list with links that point to the corresponding official pages of the browsers for download, an online activity that requires an engine for defect that is the same as that of the usual browser used, as in the example of the Steam client, in essence a Chromium in Kiosk mode.