So, I was reading the article on the PSL and I noticed that there “Controversy” section had a different bias compared to the rest of the article. The article on Maupin also has an anti-PSL bias. Can ProleWiki come to a consensus on the PSL rather than having competing biases on the PSL article?
This is the PSL article in question, and the controversies section is quoted below:
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Party_for_Socialism_and_Liberation
I don’t really see the problem here. The article doesn’t seem particularly biased to me - it just puts forward (sourced) criticisms that have been leveled at PSL.
I don’t agree that any criticism of a party is necessarily bias against them. I would personally want any potential comrade from a vulnerable demographic to be aware of those criticisms if they’re considering joining. This is much more mild than some criticism I’ve seen of PSL.
I personally think there’s plenty to criticize PSL about, but they still seem to overall be the least-bad of the U$ parties.