• I think it was an appeal to natural order, not tradition.

    One time after GPS became pretty well available a court somewhere was called upon to decide whether, now that we have this cheaply available magical system of maritime navigation, is it negligent to crash into the rocks and destroy the vessel because you were still using a sextant and navigating by the stars? I mean, that’s the way we’ve always done it. That’s an appeal to tradition.

    • GONADS125@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I disagree. It was clearly an appeal to tradition, given his specific reference to human history (traditional human hunting behavior). But the appeal to nature is also a logical fallacy anyway.

      I’m not even condemning hunting, btw. It’s necessary in some cases for healthy animal populations.

      • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is far past the point of mattering, but the actual thing I was targeting was the statement “seems pretty weird” by stating that in the context of human history, hunting is objectively not weird, that is to say, unusual or abnormal, at all.

        And I mean, if we’re trying to entertain logical rigor, I don’t think the original “appeal to vibes” is exactly a good start.