• astral_avocado@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Plus they’re trying to say he suffocated like it was torture, no they used nitrogen specifically so it didn’t activate the body’s panic response to lack of oxygen. He just fell asleep.

    Edit: he didn’t just fall asleep because he probably held his breath, according to the article, which I didnt read. In my defense I had a news app blocker on (clearly barely working)

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      10 months ago

      And the reason that works is that your body doesn’t actually detect low oxygen. When you hold your breath for a long time, the sensation comes from high CO2 levels. That’s one reason that working in a hydrogen or helium airship is dangerous, because there can be a leak and you won’t even notice until passing out.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Which is so much better than injectables, which ARE torture. They get injected with a tranq first so they don’t show signs of struggle or pain when the actual death shot is given.

      • maccentric@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If fentanyl is so cheap, available, and deadly, why don’t they just use that? Probably because they want their pound of flesh.

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also he specifically requested that they used nitrogen over other methods.

      He later changed his request to death by firing squad, but I suspect that may have been a delaying tactic rather than an actual preference.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Witnesses described writhing:

      Smith appeared to remain conscious for several minutes after the nitrogen was activated, according to five journalists who were allowed to watch the execution through glass as media witnesses. Although the mask was also secured to the gurney, he then began shaking his head and writhing for about two minutes, and then could be seen breathing deeply for several minutes before his breathing slowed and became imperceptible, the witnesses said.

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        They think he was holding his breath, so the CO2 concentration in his blood would have risen. Between the CO2 build up and just knowing you are about to be killed, it’s not surprising he started panicking and writhing.

        That’s what people miss when touting nitrogen asphyxiation as humane. It’s only humane if the person being killed willingly gives themselves over to the process and takes nice deep breaths. If they’re not willing to die of course they’re still going to resist to the best of their abilities and try and get the mask off.

      • Fuck spez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “Writhing” (or maybe just convulsions that looked like writhing considering the restraints) after he no longer appeared to be conscious. NAD but my guess is this was a hypoxic seizure, an event of which he couldn’t possibly have been aware.

        Edit: Assuming I’m right, and if we ever get to the point where this is proven to be a “humane” form of execution, then the convulsions could reasonably be prevented with muscle relaxing drugs the same way they’re are prevented during surgery or lethal injection… But I’d rather we just get to the point where we see the whole concept of retributive justice as inhumane.

      • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        This is pretty surprising, everything I’ve read indicates that he should indeed have been out in seconds. I wonder if the mask was a bad fit or the nitrogen wasn’t pure?

        • atomicorange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It’s definitely not just seconds. Think about how long you can hold your breath, you’d be conscious for at least that long. You start getting brain damage after like 4 minutes without oxygen, and can live for maybe 6 minutes.

          Edit: I’m wrong here! See the reply for why.

          • MyEdgyAlt@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think this is quite right. Read up on “time of useful consciousness”. I think if you exhale the air in your lungs and inhale oxygen-free air you’ll be out much faster than if you just held your breath. I’m not entirely sure if total pressure matters or partial pressure matters, but I’m quite sure that there will be some similar effect. I have found some claims that the partial pressure is the major factor, so breathing pure nitrogen seems like it would incapacitate someone faster than holding their breath does, because the nitrogen is actively removing oxygen from their blood.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        At least part of that was attributed to him holding his breath for as long as possible once they started administrating the gas.

        • atomicorange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I totally get the impulse, but breathing in nitrogen wasn’t the thing that would harm him. It’s just lack of oxygen, which holding your breath isn’t going to help.

          Legal execution is fucking sickening, It’s horrifying that we did that to him.

          • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            What’s even more sickening is him stabbing that woman to death, can you imagine how much fear and pain she went through?

            • lordkuri@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, and 2 wrongs make a right of course. /s

              Or maybe it’s about vengeance and not about paying a due to society?

              • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It is about vengeance and also about not perpetually providing room and board for someone who lost their rights when they decided to take someone else’s rights to life away.

                Edit: why would they have an inalienable right to life, even if it is a meager life in prison, if they decided they can takeinnocent people’s lives for their own deranged reasons?

                • letsgo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s easy to answer. Justice is not perfect, and sooner or later you will execute an innocent person. We know this has happened in the UK, because DNA evidence proved that the person couldn’t have been there, and they would have been released had they not been executed.

                  Death is final and you don’t just respawn at your bed, so this is the worst possible outcome. Abolishing the death penalty avoids this terrible situation, and yes it means you keep people like this alive until their natural death, but it also maximises the chance that new evidence can be found that proves that person didn’t in fact commit the crime.

                  • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Sure I’m sympathetic to that argument. I’ve recently looked up lists of some of the people that most likely were found innocent post execution.

                    But what if we had stricter criteria. What about the people we are absolutely certain, with witnesses and camera footage, are guilty of murder? I’m specifically thinking of people like Nikolas Cruz, a school shooter who killed 17?

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He just fell asleep.

      eyewitness accounts disagree

      "Smith’s spiritual adviser, the Rev. Jeff Hood, who’d previously expressed concern that the method could be inhumane, witnessed the execution and described it in more graphic terms, saying it was ‘the most horrible thing I’ve ever seen.’

      Smith, wearing a tight-fitting mask that covered his entire face, convulsed when the gas was turned on, ‘popped up on the gurney’ repeatedly, and gasped, heaved and spat, Hood said.

      ‘It was absolutely horrific,’ he said."

      “Smith, who was on a gurney, appeared conscious for “several minutes into the execution,” and “shook and writhed” for about two minutes after that, media witnesses said in a joint report.”

      https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/26/us/alabama-execution-nitrogen-what-we-know/index.html

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also leaving out the fact that the executed and his lawyer both said this method was preferential to lethal injection.