• JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t see why they do any method other than a bullet or the lance gun thing they use to kill cows/sheep/etc by launching a spike into the brain. Surely that’s the quickest and painless method right?

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, if we really wanted an instant-death mechanism with zero chance of any pain then we’d probably pack the victim in dynamite and vaporize them faster than nerve signals can travel.

        Unfortunately people who are pro-death-penalty are often weirdly squeamish about stuff like that.

      • jwt@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure, if you shoot someone in the head from 20ft or accidentally drive a rod in someone’s brain that might occasionally be a survivable event. But if you aim from closeby, with the intent of ending someones life? Chances of survival are slim to none. (With a mercy shot being an option if that’s the case)

        I’m vehemently against the death penalty, but there are about a thousand ways to do it ‘better’ than the US is doing right now (it just wouldn’t be as neat/clean, which apparently is more important to the people in charge)

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Quickest and least painful is probably the guillotine. Immediate drop in blood pressure to the brain might give you a few seconds of consciousness after it happens, but you’d be in too much shock to feel any pain. You wouldn’t be slowly choking to death like this fellow.