simple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoRussia starts blocking VPN at the protocol (WireGuard, OpenVPN) levelvpncentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square193fedilinkarrow-up11.09Karrow-down118 cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up11.08Karrow-down1external-linkRussia starts blocking VPN at the protocol (WireGuard, OpenVPN) levelvpncentral.comsimple@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square193fedilink cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squaremruczek@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoChinese firewall can detect it, AFAIK
minus-squareInverseParallax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoGfw is mostly picky about anything udp or where both ports are unknown. Also if the known port (server) isn’t from a licensed block. Basically there are heuristics that lead to either a reset, a temp block, or a perm block, but it seems to vary from time to time a lot.
minus-squareSpiritreader@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWireguard through gfw worked fine when I tried it. The other client did have a static IP and static Port tho, that probably helped
Chinese firewall can detect it, AFAIK
Gfw is mostly picky about anything udp or where both ports are unknown. Also if the known port (server) isn’t from a licensed block.
Basically there are heuristics that lead to either a reset, a temp block, or a perm block, but it seems to vary from time to time a lot.
Wireguard through gfw worked fine when I tried it. The other client did have a static IP and static Port tho, that probably helped