NegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.eecake to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down11cross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
arrow-up1219arrow-down1external-linkFederal appeals court rules Texas book bans likely violate Constitutionthehill.comNegativeNull@lemm.ee@lemm.eecake to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: texas@lemmy.world
minus-squarecannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up20·7 months agoThat is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
minus-squareItsAFake@lemmus.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 months agoAhh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.
That is the wording they often use on injunctions. As there has not been a full trial they like to keep it as “likely”.
Ahh so it’s like “Allegedly”, a legal safety net.