• DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    …some of the best engineers in the world trying to build an impossible thing.

    Something tells me that these were not in fact, the best engineers in the world if they knew a project was impossible and tried to make it anyway. I feel like the “best” engineers in the world would try and make things that are actually practical and possible in our reality.

    • redtea@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      Rather than looking at trains and thinking, if we build those we can sell tickets, they looked at shareholders and the government and thought, I bet we could fleece them. We’re seeing the military effects of this, too, with neoliberales looking shocked as to why more and more funding doesn’t automatically equal more and more armaments. Commodity production detached from anything with the use value that makes the commodity a commodity.

      I think the practical is the most important factor, here. It’s hard to know how one of the world’s richest billionaires can get so deep into a project that has an exchange value but no use value. This is what happens when imperialists dismiss productive capital, and become parasitic on government grants, defrauded shareholders, and asset stripping. It was the same with crypto and nfts.

      • mughaloid@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        it is because as Vijay Prashad said US billionaires hid their monies in illicit tax havens in UK and EU. And there is no state control to put those monies back into infrastructure but Elon musk sure have his pet projects like Mars colonization and Hyperloopy , I mean why not Elon and military industrial complex don’t get why ordinary people need food and stuff.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Musk’s “Mars colonization” project will end up the exact same way as his “hyperloop”. One day it will simply and quietly be declared dead and everyone will forget about it. (Meanwhile China and Russia will be building a moon base together.)

            • Hexbear2 [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Rockets have always been a dead-end technology. Humanity will never get to the next step in space race, which is economical mineral mining of the asteroid belt, until the world unites and builds a space port in Peru. The very best place to launch is at the equator (fastest angular velocity) at the highest mountain–Basically, somewhere in the Andes. The way to do it is to build a tube up the side of a mountain, make it miles long, and use electromagnetic rails to accelerate the space capsule, it cuts the cost of launch by 99%. This will allow payloads to be launched and for space assembly of larger modules to go do asteroid mining. NASA has known this is the future for decades now, but instead of doing this, we have shitty rocket 1960s technology from Elon Musk. I hate him.

              More on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarTram

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Well, to be fair, the hyperloop was in many respects a fraud used to test out technology intended for Mars (like boring). That said, I think Mars is the pie in the sky that Musk will never abandon while he is still pitching projects to rubes because it is so much easier to “postpone” than civilian infrastructure

  • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Poor economic choices” is building functioning railways that people use.

    As opposed to the good economic choice of HS2 where you plan to build a London to Manchester rail in 12 years, and then proceed to spend 6 years building nothing before announcing your rail-line that doesn’t exist is actually only going to go to Birmingham now.

    No, I’m not envious of china being able to actually build railways while TERF island just plans to spend ~a decade imagining how cool it’d be if they hypothetically had a railway. /s

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 months ago

      “No rail-less nations are building rails” shows the infantile level at which this guy’s brain operates. Global north countries are steadily showing a decline in living conditions while most global south countries don’t have the economic sovereignty to invest in public infrastructure. Rail-less nations are not building rails because of neoliberal austerity not because it is not a sound investment.

      • kot [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        11 months ago

        The real reason why no one builds railroads (except for china) is because of automobile industry lobbying. For instance, Brazil used to have a functioning rail system until around the 60s, until a bunch of car factories moved in and started pressuring the government to not only invest more on roads, but to abandon passenger trains altogether as an “incentive” for people to buy cars. It’s also the reason why so many right wingers are so against walkable cities, they pretty much just gobble up corporate propaganda and think cars are freedom machines.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 months ago

          until around the 60s, until a bunch of car factories moved in and started pressuring the government to not only invest more on roads, but to abandon passenger trains altogether as an “incentive” for people to buy cars.

          Is there any connection to the military dictatorship here?

          • kot [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, actually. It was used to force the neoliberal ‘experiment’ onto the population, same as what happened in Chile and in other Latin American countries. Also, a lot of the supporters of the regime, as well as the upper echelons, were composed of capitalists. It’s a textbook example of fascists and the bourgeoisie working together to suppress leftist movements and force unpopular economic policies.

            This article talks about it in more depth, but it’s in portuguese: https://app.uff.br/riuff/handle/1/24398

  • Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    11 months ago

    “China doesn’t count because I don’t consider nonwhite nations to be successful”

    • hellvolution@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      11 months ago

      China doesn’t count because they are ruled by the revolutionary popular power, not by a bloody dictatorship controlled by oligarchs as normal “democracies”

  • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    Billions of dollars essentially gone to shit only to come up with trains but in tunnels and failing drastically

    • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wasn’t the hyperloop supposed to be pod based in some far back concept iteration? It’s not even train in tunnel, that’s just a subway, it’s gadgetbahn in tunnels

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          11 months ago

          Isambard Brunel, one of history’s great engineers, tried to make one in the 1800s.

          The project failed due to materials science limits of the day (leather seals for high vacuum)

          So he went back to building normal, non-silly railways.

          So it’s fair to say “maybe we didn’t have the technology 150 years ago” but that also means you know exactly what mistakes to not repeat. Of course, this assumes a good-faith operation, not a placebo promised to keep people from demanding normal, non-silly railways in thr first place.

  • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Read the replies to the Hyperloop tweet to see what a neoliberalism-poisoned PhD brain and its worshippers looks like. Gems like “the idea would have been viable with infinite money” and that the point of failure was the tunneling, which is literally the first step of the whole concept.

  • olgas_husband@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 months ago

    sure, an efficient country wide logistics network is a poor economic choice compared to a gamer tunnel that glogs and you can get out

  • tamagotchicowboy [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you aren’t this no material analysis sort frankly they won’t consider you in some fields/schools for a PhD, its all by design. If you have seen the grass outside you are unfit for the ivory halls.