• n3m37h@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can NASA start making motherboards for PCs? Average lifetime for one now is under 10 years

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      They usually become outdated before they break, ie. an important component like the CPU can’t be upgraded any more, because it won’t fit, so you need to upgrade the whole thing.

      • n3m37h@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes I know Intel works on a Tic Tock system so every 2 generations they change the pinouts. AM4 lasted 4 generations, hopefully AM5 will too but unlikely. Still a CPU will last well over 10 years. Motherboards on the other hand, dont even though they should last a lot longer esp considering all the tantilum / other SMD capacitors.

        Voyager also only uses mW of power compared to the 25-300w of current CPUs

        Alson I was joking about NASA doing anything other than space stuff

        • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Just FYI, the tick-tock model followed by Intel doesn’t directly have anything to do with sockets and pin outs.

          The tick-tock model meant that after each change of the microarchitecture was followed by a die shrink. While a new socket is likely a consequence of these changes, it is a necessary byproduct rather than an intentional change.

          Furthermore, Intel hasn’t used the tick-tock model since 2016.

          However, trying to compare terrestrial consumer hardware with rugged radiation hardened hardware is futile. They have drastically different design/engineering specs that have hard limits with respect to physics, even special process nodes for true radiation hardening (RHBP). I think they’re only 150nm, I want to say there were some RHBP 65nm FPGAs recently, but I’m not 100%.

          I have a feeling though if NASA were to make components, they’d all just be specialized embedded systems rather than anything consumer or enterprise. After all, computers are but tools to do different jobs.

              • n3m37h@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                All good, I get a kick on showing my knowledge too haha or lack of in most cases.

                I still want a mobo that can outlast my fkn CPU! HELP NASA! ;)

                PS thanks for correcting me about the end of Intel’s tic tock model with their inability to shrink a node for 5 or so years

        • Cort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          While am4 lasted 4 generations, you can’t put 4th Gen chips in a 1st Gen board or vice versa. There are even some 1st Gen boards that can’t do 3rd Gen chips and vice versa.

          I was fairly disappointed when I found out AMD blocked Asus from updating 1st & 2nd Gen motherboards to be able to use pcie 4.0 with an agesa update on the BIOS. Blocked is probably the wrong word here though as Asus had already released the boss updates that unlocked pcie 4 on 1st Gen boards with 3rd Gen CPUs. /Rant

          Edited: verb tenses

            • Cort@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              No, like Asus tested and certified half of their existing motherboards and released it and it worked fine for a couple weeks before AMD removed that ability. I get why some people may not want to risk signal integrity, but that should be my choice, not AMD’s.