The judge in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s upcoming trial over his handling of classified documents made two key errors in a June trial, one of which violated a fundamental constitutional right of the defendant and could have invalidated the proceedings, according to legal experts and a court transcript.

  • fabian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re right, she might do a good job, and I sincerely hope she does.

    I think lack of experiece and poor performance in the past is a good indicator that she’s likely to do a bad job in the future.

    Why does it matter if “the media” is trying to make her look bad? There’s no election, the choice has been made. The point of this article is to provide information about her past performance, specifically because she has already been rebuked by a higher court for what they considered to be poor reasoning and lack of understanding of the case and because it is going to be such a prominent and complex case with so much riding on it.

      • fabian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thank you. I hope I didn’t come across as aggressive, and I genuinely appreciate your concern for our collective teeth.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, be aggressive. Push back against incorrect statements. It’s the only way to fix this shit. I worked in News and saw how the sausage is made. I don’t want to rant, but the whole news business is “off” because of profit. They’re supposed to be informing people, not appealing to emotions.