• Hider9k@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at that one artist who “remixed” the “I’m Blue” song and made something completely unlistenable and forgettable out of it.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fucking hell this comes up on the radio every time I drive and I’ve had to borrow my mom’s spare car while my bike is fucked. I don’t mess the radio because I’ll forget to turn it back, not that there is anything better on anyway.

  • cmhickman358@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for covers, it’s interesting to hear someone else’s take on a particular song, but remixes where all they change is just the pitch and/or tempo are just lazy and unappealing.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or they add a bunch of trap/dubstep nonsense and lazy stuttered and repeated vocals. It’s been done to death.

  • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    In a word, Yes.

    The music industry, like the movie industry and video game industry, wants guaranteed hits. What better way to guarantee a hit than to rehash some old thing that is now more than 7 years old. (And falling!)

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’re at the point of monkeys typing keyboards and waiting for entertaining things to come out of it.

    It’s not that the process changed or got better … we just kept adding millions of monkeys to the system

    AI is the equivalent of adding billions of monkeys and while they produce a lot of stupid senseless stuff, every once in a while it makes sense.