E.g. abortion rights, anti-LGBTQ, contempt for atheism, Christian nationalism, etc.

  • Trantarius@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I used to consider myself republican, and I think I’m still closer to republican than democrat. I prefer small government, which is at least sometimes a republican ideal. I am also against identity politics of any kind, so I am against affirmative action. I am in favor of gun rights, with regulations that allow for appropriate tracking of who has guns where, how they are stored, how they are transported etc. However, regulations that prevent particular people from owning guns or ban any particular weapons should be very conservative. Even felons should regain gun rights after an appropriate period of time. Only ridiculously dangerous weapons, like nukes, should be outright banned. Stuff like full auto weapons should be legal, but restricted to only be stored at a gun range or something. As far as LGBT goes, I don’t think the government should have anything to do with them. Let them do what they want, let people react how they want (as long as it isn’t violent of course, which is already illegal under other laws). I’ve never been really sure about abortion. My gut reaction is to just let people do what they want, but I struggle to logically justify it as anything but murder. Not to mention the impracticality of banning it.

    I wouldn’t really call myself a republican anymore though. This is largely because of the religious aspects. I don’t know if republicans have actually become more authoritarian or if my perception has just changed, but either way they don’t seem to prioritize the same things as me anymore. Things like right to repair, net neutrality, and E2EE are important to me, but they don’t align with that at all. The party also keeps embracing identity politics, just with different identities than their opposition. Religion should be a non-factor from a governmental perspective. It doesn’t need any special protections, just to be ignored.

    If I had to call myself something, I guess I would be a ‘libertarian socialist’, however much of an oxymoron that seems to be. For instance, I like the idea of UBI, largely because it would allow almost all welfare/social programs to be eliminated (including social security). Doing so would reduce government control, because they no longer have an ability to tweak who gets what, since everyone gets the same amount.

  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    They happen to align with my values. I was raised Christian, and I only became agnostic in college, so that probably plays into it.

    For example, abortion, I think murder is abohherent, baby murder especially so. I don’t know when the right to life begins, so I err on the side of caution, at the earliest point, at conception.

    Im not anti-lgbtq.

    I dont hold contempt for atheism, I dont like /r/atheism

    Christian nationalism is weird one because no one seems to know what that actually means. And hell, freedom of religion is one of the most important rights, right next to free speech.

    I hope that helps.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Honest question. How do you reconcile your claim about not being anti-lgbt when the GOP is very vocally and openly pushing anti-lgbt messaging and legislation.

      • NataliePortland@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You know I voted for Hillary and Biden even though both trashed the idea of Medicare For All. That’s a huge issue for me, but you don’t really get to pick your politicians. You only pick the lesser of two evils. Republicans don’t like Dems. They might not love Trump or even Ted Cruz but for some people that’s their lesser of two evils. So I can’t speak for this other commenter but I can understand why you might vote for someone who doesn’t share your values

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          And for plenty of policy points that’s not an issue. When we’re on the topic of basic human rights, I’m not entirely sure how you* can handwave those abuses away because you want lower taxes.

          * generic you

            • Alto@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              If there’s an answer that isn’t basically “well they’re not on my priority list so they can get fucked”, I’d love to hear it. We’re not talking about some relatively benign issue like zoning laws or whether or not we should introduce a new sales tax to fund the park system. Sitting by complacently is actively tacitly supporting the policies trying to further these abuses, and it’s not some trivial issue that doesn’t matter.

              • Throwaway@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                The right is pro-2a. The left is not.

                The lgbtq should arm themselves, before anything else.

                The gop is unintionally better for lgbtq than the dnc.

    • enki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Banning abortion doesn’t stop abortion, it just shifts it to a black market where women are far more likely to die.

      What does demonstrably reduce abortion to effectively insignificant levels is better sex education and easy access to contraceptives.

      Prohibition has never worked. Education always has.

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Let’s replace some words. I think that abortion is murder. So it becomes:

        “Banning murder doesn’t stop murder”

        Do you see the point I’m trying to make?

      • FrenLivesMatter@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Banning abortion doesn’t stop abortion, it just shifts it to a black market where women are far more likely to die.

        Perhaps, but it will likely at least severely reduce it. It’s certainly not appropriate to assume that every woman who would have had an abortion when it’s safe and legal would also do so when it’s dangerous and illegal. More likely, it would lead to a rise in babies given up for adoption.

  • Praise Idleness@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Friendly reminder that the right wing party in my country is a bit far from being religious, mostly because more than 60% of the population (and honestly, more than 80% based on my speculation) is atheist. Anti-lgbtq being dominant here is definitely not because of religious reasons but the general conservative sentiments we had for so long. Abortion is frowned upon, but no one actually believes that it should be downright criminalized except for some religion nuts.

    Protestantism is pretty much hated by general public since we had some issues with some religion nuts making people’s life miserable.

  • ChefTyler1980@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I can only speak for my friends who fit your criteria: they’re single issue voters (like many Americans) and they’re afraid the Dems are coming for their guns.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are basically just democrats except they like guns.

      Tbf, there’s liberals like that too, myself included. There’s a joke going around that “once you are far enough left you get your guns back”.