I disagree. This is as you say Precisely the type of thing that happens when an image generator is asked to make a chart/diagram, so to me it seems a really wild leap to go from “This looks like exactly what happens when X” to “someone must have designed this to look like what happens when X”.
If it were human designed, I think it would be intentionally funny (which realistically would backfire, but anyway…)
(And besides, paid ChatGPT does indeed connect to DALL-E 3 now)
This has all the hallmarks of “human pretending to be an AI” rather than actual AI output
I disagree. This is as you say Precisely the type of thing that happens when an image generator is asked to make a chart/diagram, so to me it seems a really wild leap to go from “This looks like exactly what happens when X” to “someone must have designed this to look like what happens when X”.
If it were human designed, I think it would be intentionally funny (which realistically would backfire, but anyway…)
(And besides, paid ChatGPT does indeed connect to DALL-E 3 now)
That’s how you know the AI is good! actually.
/s
Why do you think that?
There’s a level of continuity in the image you don’t get with image generating AI yet.
Also it’s littered with "AI getting things slightly wrong* memes
Also also, ChatGPT doesn’t output images
It does. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt-can-now-see-hear-and-speak