• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    This was my first thought… But then why are the employees taking a stand against it?

    There’s got to be more to this story

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Bandwagoning. The narrative is so easy to spin "hey the evil board of directors forced our beloved CEO to leave. If they do that to /US/ we need to do it back to /them/.

      I think that would get most people with moral concerns on board, the rest are just tech bros and would fully support a money grubbing unethical CEO if they thought they might get a bigger bonus out of it.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, isn’t this just an attempt to instil democracy in their workplace? If the vast majority of employees want something, whether or not it is objectively in their best interest, shouldn’t leadership listen to them? Isn’t this just what unions do on the regular?

        I have no dog in this fight, I don’t know who’s a good person and who’s bad, but I believe in democracy even when it doesn’t produce the best result. I wish all companies acted upon the wishes of their employees rather than their shareholders, customers or consumers; that would make for far more cohesive and productive workplaces.