His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Isn’t religion one of a few “protected classes”? Can’t fire someone for race, sex, religion, disability, or age. I think you can’t deny service for those reasons either. Well not if the SCOTUS considered precedent and made good faith rulings at least.

        • TheOriginalGregToo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          “Should” is the operative word in my statement. I personally believe that you SHOULD have that right. I have always held the belief that I would much rather people discriminate against me openly so I can determine who I want to give my money to. If a company doesn’t want to do business with me, then I certainly don’t want to do business with them. Instead we have laws that prohibit discrimination, but face discrimination in practice. It’s like having a friend who smiles to your faces, but talks shit about you behind your back. No thanks, I’ll pass.

      • Redfugee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        It’s your business but if you want to do business in the US, federal and a lot of state laws say you can’t discriminate against customers based on factors such as race, religion, sex or national origin.

          • Redfugee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            This ruling confirms that people who are LGBTQ+ can be discriminated against in ways that other people cannot.

            • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              That’s kind of the point, right? So, are businesses allowed to do business with whoever they please? Does the discrimination clause prevent a business owner from deciding not to do business with some people? Which precedes the other?

              • Redfugee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                In the US there are laws to protect certain groups against discrimination, so no, a business cannot legally just do business with whoever they please if they are discriminating against a protected group.

                All this ruling shows is that LGBTQ+ folks are not a protected group and have less rights under the law than other groups (religious groups, for example).

                • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Did this ruling explicitly strike lgbtq+ folk from the protected classes? I guess that’s where I’m hung up.

                  Are they no longer a protected class or did this ruling just say that a business doesn’t have to abide by the protected class rule in certain circumstances?

                  And to follow up, how far does that go? Where’s the line?