• Ashen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Also isn’t this skewed because Zuck accounts for 2% himself? I had read that in an earlier post mentioning the same.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          No, he has 2% of millennial’s wealth, so 0.02 x 0.046 = 0.00092 or 0.092% of the grand total and millennials without him have 4.6% - 0.092% = 4.508% of the total wealth. If his wealth was how you interpret it he would be a trillionaire.