For me its probably the debate regarding using a VPN with tor - Like the tor devs themselves recommend against using a VPN with tor.

Another is also probably the argument of “nothing to hide, nothing to fear”.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The biggest one people usually get wrong is thinking their messages on WhatsApp, Telegram, and other proprietary messengers are private

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      My brother does this. And it’s easy to see how people fall for this when the disinformation from those companies keeps telling you how private your messages are and that not even WhatsApp can read them. Yet when you lose your old phone and reinstall on a new phone, your old messages magically show up without you having to provide an encryption key.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        your old messages magically show up without you having to provide an encryption key

        Do they? I thought you had to explicitely back them up to get them on a new device. At least that’s how it was when I still used it.

        • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They do with Telegram. In WhatsApp (if I recall correctly) it auto-retrieves from your google drive.

          (Come to think of it…if that means the encryption key is just with you in your google drive and not with WhatsApp, then is that more secure than I have previously believed??)

          With Signal they prompt you to pull the data and generate and encryption key. If you lose either of those things then there’s no way to get your messages back since no one else has them.

          • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Telegram doesn’t surprise me, chats aren’t even encrypted per default in some instances (group chats, I believe?)

            But then again, how solid is any encryption if Matrix bridges can exist?

            • nitneroc@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Matrix bridges have nothing to do with encryption, they read the messages exactly the same way a client would, and send them to the other side of the bridge exactly the same way a client would.

              • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                They have a lot to do with encryption. As an example, Signal and Matrix use different encryption standards. So to get a message across, it needs to be decrypted mid-transit, to then be re-encrypted with the protocol of the recipient.

                Any one of your contacts can set this up without your knowledge or consent, and then there’s a gap in the encryption. They can just freely give away the keys to their chats they have with you, and now a third-party has the means to decrypt your messages.

                That’s pretty fucked if you think about it, but there’s not much you can do.

                Sure, it’s not a huge problem if the service doing it is verifiable to have good security and doesn’t snoop, but it’s still adding another link in the chain to trust and to keep intact.

                • nitneroc@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  That’s exactly what I said, each side of the bridge has its own encryption standard (or no encryption at all).

                  The encryption could be as solid as possible, the problem would remain unchanged: to bridge messages between two services that are not interoperable, you need to decrypt them at some point.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              No Telegram chats are end-to-end encrypted by default. And I don’t know anyone who’d use the feature regularly (it’s a hassle).

              And, to be fair, it’s not really necessary for most day to day messaging.

              • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                I think it’s very much necessary to insist on our right to privacy. Personal chats not being encrypted should be a clear and absolute NO for anyone.

                • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Ideally, yeah. Practically, shit like stickers or media sharing is way more important to the vast majority of people.

              • library_napper@monyet.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                That’s not true. Please don’t spread misinformation. That’s literally the point of this thread.

                TLS encryption to telegram servers is not e2ee. That’s the point

                  • jet@hackertalks.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    Your sentence, and punctuation, are ambiguous. When I read it I thought you were saying they were end to end encrypted. But seeing your second comment and rereading it, I can see how you meant it to be they are not end to end encrypted

          • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            The Google Drive backups are not encrypted by default. It looks like they’ve recently added the option to encrypt backups with your own key or password, which is a decent feature.

      • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        FWIW, I swap between phones weekly (separate work phone w/o cameras, but same phone number), and transfer my WhatsApp account at the same time. Both the phones have their own unique message history, and it does not sync between devices. I do not have backups enabled on either phone.