• jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That doesn’t sound like a kind of “AI” usage I’m particularly concerned about, but would be willing to listen to reasons of why it is or isn’t a problem

          • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I just genuinely don’t like the look of most AI generated imagery, also there’s the ever prevalent conundrum that is the lack of supporting actual human artists.

            • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Out of curiosity, did you not like the images before you read that they used AI? Its pretty obvious that it was used as a tool by human artists from the write-up, in the same way that a human artist would use Photoshop.

          • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            The AI used was likely trained on sets of data without the consent nor compensation of the people whose works were used.

            • Belgdore@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve never understood this argument in a vacuum. Fair use includes education. And people have been getting inspired by art they don’t own a copyright to for ever.

              There are lots of other critiques of ai that I do agree with.

              • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                I didn’t take it to mean that the AI was exclusively trained on their own images, but good on them if they are.

        • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I almost would have preferred that they lower the quality of the images they took, or use an older camera for more of that “old school jank” vibe they were supposedly going for.

        • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          lol the idea of an AI bot designed to criticize AI is hilarious and may be an acceptable use of AI.