compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前ISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square245linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down135file-text
arrow-up11.1Karrow-down1imageISO 8601slrpnk.netcompostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 28 天前message-square245linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up56arrow-down1·28 天前The joke is that they’ve not been given in ISO8601 format, and also that they’re both ambiguous. For the second one, we can’t even tell which of the ends is the year.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·28 天前Honestly Randall absolutely would put the year in the middle just to fuck with us
minus-squarebrsrklf@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up21·28 天前Publication 1988-06-05, latest amendment 2004-12-01. I almost expected the two dates to use different formats, but no, they’re just both “the American way”.
minus-squareSuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·28 天前Well you can only cram in so many jokes at once. Would have been funny though
minus-squarepressanykeynow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·28 天前Knowing Americans it’s probably the middle.
The joke is that they’ve not been given in ISO8601 format, and also that they’re both ambiguous. For the second one, we can’t even tell which of the ends is the year.
Honestly Randall absolutely would put the year in the middle just to fuck with us
Publication 1988-06-05, latest amendment 2004-12-01.
I almost expected the two dates to use different formats, but no, they’re just both “the American way”.
Well you can only cram in so many jokes at once. Would have been funny though
Knowing Americans it’s probably the middle.