• yata@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In Sid Meier’s Civilization sure, but real history is a lot more complex than that. There were people who came to that conclusion since ancient times without it leading to a scientific and industrial revolution, because there were a lot more factors at play with those than just simply the idea of it.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      An idea has to be widely accepted to be useful.

      Just having one person think about it while the rest of society doesn’t is insufficient.

      • HardlightCereal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The actual reason science took off is that there was a plague leading to a worker shortage leading to a wealth boom, while a lot of rich people had access to coffee and nothing to do.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I, too, am a big fan of the Coffee hypothesis, it should be noted that lots of civilizations had access to caffeine and other stimulants, including the Arabs, Chinese and Incas and probably the Roman’s, Greeks and Persians too.

          And there were a lot of plagues, but most of them happened long before the scientific revolution.

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Free time and the wealth to have that time is what I also think the catalyst is. Same with arts. You can’t do experiments or spend time on art if your entire life is consumed by labor.