Been thinking about how EV trucks seem to get more range than cars/SUVs. Is this because of the surface area of the vehicle compared to the weight (with an empty truck bed)? Would an unloaded EV El Camino theoretically get better “mileage” than something like a Bolt?
Biggest thing is the size allows for a much bigger battery; which means more capacity.
El Caminos never went out of style in Aus. They call them Utes, short for utility vehicles - They’re pretty rad
Oh, man! I wouldn’t even care if the range were the same as a sedan. El Caminos are cool! I mean, the front is like a car, the back is like a truck!
The new Kia Ute is basically that
AFAIK EV pickups lag in efficiency but make up for it in sheer battery pack size. The F-150 Lightning gets 2 miles/kWh (cruising I believe) while a Bolt is probably around 3-4 so be sure to double-check the range compared to the usable capacity ratings on their batteries!
You’re confusing mileage and range. Range is a function of the vehicle’s energy capacity, whether it be fuel or electricity, whereas mileage relates the energy expended by the vehicle to travel a certain distance.
It might be correct to say an F150 has better range than a Corolla (which might not even be true), just because the F150 has a much larger fuel tank. But, as is obvious, the fuel an F150 expends to travel a certain distance is much larger than that expended by the Corolla, or you’d say the Corolla gets better mileage than the F150.
It’s the same in EVs. Simply, an F150 Lightning has a higher capacity battery (fuel tank) than a Bolt, but the ‘mileage’ of the Lightning is much worse than the Bolt.
The longest range EVs are actually large sedans with huge batteries, see the model s plaid and lucid air (400 mile range).