RothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agoThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1741arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1741arrow-down1imageThis (rule)slemmy.blahaj.zoneRothyBuyak@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 10 months agomessage-square153fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTiKa444@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up34·edit-210 months agoIt’s clearly false. In a leftist world the man and the sheep would take the bus.
minus-squarekrimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·10 months agono they’d each ride a bike because it’s a walkable city
minus-squareLucyLastic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoWalkable city means taking a bike. Got it.
minus-squareGabu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 months agoLargely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.
It’s clearly false. In a leftist world the man and the sheep would take the bus.
no they’d each ride a bike because it’s a walkable city
Walkable city means taking a bike. Got it.
correct
Largely, yes. Bicycles are a better, healthier way to move distances longer than 100-ish meters, ideally are only powered by human effort and move at speeds low enough that accidents are absurdly unlikely.