• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is a lot safer on Linux than Windows, this year. A lot of engineering has gone into making updates resilient.

    And Linux hasn’t done the Windows 10 to Windows 11 - black screen for a couple hours, hope you know not to touch it - that we sometimes see.

    Linux now has a stronger default permissions model, so it’s a lot harder for user error to break the machine in serious ways, even if they do reboot during a sensitive update.

    • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Linux does do the black screen and hope you don’t touch it, at least OpenSUSE and Fedora do. And that’s a good thing. The “reboot to update is bad” meme needs to die but I digress. I’m skeptical that Linux is more resilient than Windows when it comes to updating but even if it is, Windows automatically rolls back failed updates while Linux will boot you into broken system and expect you to know what to do. Regular people can’t deal with this, even if the answer is a simple as selecting a different entry from the GRUB.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        while Linux will boot you into broken system and expect you to know what to do.

        But…

        even if the answer is a simple as selecting a different entry from the GRUB.

        Okay. Yeah. It’s often that simple.

        I take your point, but I’ve had my Windows blow itself to hell way more than my Linux has, and putting Linux on relatives machines has been by far the least hassle of the big three, for me.

        But that’s just my anecdotal experience.