• bedrooms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alright, so I think we agree that

          1. what you complained was not my point (it’s written)
          2. you don’t understand my point

          At this point, you’re replying to a text you don’t understand. Why do you do that?

          • pbjamm@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            An excellent question. At this point I have no idea why I should continue trying to engage with you on this discussion platform.

            Good Day.

              • acastcandream@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There’s nothing to understand lmfao you’ve said nothing of substance! How many people need to point out how vacuous you’re being before you shake off this principal skinner moment of yours?

                I’m done man. Feel free to have the last word, I’m sure it’s very important to you.

                • bedrooms@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you check replies to my comment from different people, you’ll see one person who understood what I wrote. So, no, it’s of substance.

                  As you started insulting me, I have one thing to say to you. I’ve met people online with poor reading skills and most of them inserted “lmfao” in their comments in an attempt to appear strong.