• bedrooms@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Alright, so I think we agree that

        1. what you complained was not my point (it’s written)
        2. you don’t understand my point

        At this point, you’re replying to a text you don’t understand. Why do you do that?

        • pbjamm@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          An excellent question. At this point I have no idea why I should continue trying to engage with you on this discussion platform.

          Good Day.

            • acastcandream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s nothing to understand lmfao you’ve said nothing of substance! How many people need to point out how vacuous you’re being before you shake off this principal skinner moment of yours?

              I’m done man. Feel free to have the last word, I’m sure it’s very important to you.

              • bedrooms@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you check replies to my comment from different people, you’ll see one person who understood what I wrote. So, no, it’s of substance.

                As you started insulting me, I have one thing to say to you. I’ve met people online with poor reading skills and most of them inserted “lmfao” in their comments in an attempt to appear strong.