• zedcell@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    https://www.ft.com/content/762cd291-2a62-4e00-b69f-c60f9ee31a6e?sharetype=blocked

    The “functionality is entirely reliant on the US”. I.e. in order for Trident to function we need missiles from the US to carry the atomic warheads and we need to spend money every few years to replace old and out of date missiles. If the US decided to stop selling us the missiles Trident would cease to function. Ergo they have outsized control over our nuclear deterrent.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If we wanted to launch the missiles today we could. So in your mind the plan on the part of the US is to wait about 20 years until the missiles don’t work and then invade?

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Long term due to maintenance…sure

      …but today we have all we need to launch a strike.

      • Darkmoon_UK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Also if it really mattered I’m sure the UK could work out how to do much if the required maintenance themselves. It’s not exotic tech at this point.