We are federated with the paedophile instance people have been complaining about. And I don’t think I want to wait until their content starts showing in my time line. We need an admin ASAP or jump ship.

See here: https://sh.itjust.works/post/6400367

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully we won’t see any of that here because nobody here is subscribing to that instance (yet). The lack of an admin does mean that we won’t get any new users who might want to fuck things up, but that’s a pretty small silver lining on a pretty ominous-looking cloud.

    Lemmy.world’s defed list has a few other noncey instances blocked which we’ve not had any trouble with, any reason to assume this one will cause more problems?

    Also paedophile, please, we don’t need American spellings adding insult to injury!

  • fjordo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is there a good alternative instance to this one that has an active admin? Seems like the writing’s on the wall for this instance if we don’t get our admin back…

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the Admin doesn6come.back we will spin up a new instance. Hopefully, the new update will make Tom break cover and we can sort this one out but we are actively working on a plan for a replacement.

    • Phil K@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One concern is that apps tend to cache images locally, so even troublesome photos being in the timeline could mean it’s stored temporarily on your device.

      This happens the other week with those TikTok videos that were actually CSAM.

      It really does need an admin to be on the ball.

  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has anyone actually verified the claims, or are they taking the word “paraphilia” which can be used to describe just about any fetish, to mean “this has pedophilia”?

    I admit, I haven’t looked into the claim. But the only supporting evidence I have seen is the fact that pedophilia is a paraphilia.

    And to be clear on why I am asking, the term paraphilia also covers things such as the entirety of BDSM, voyeurism , and exhibitionism.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I did a dive on that instance, it’s about a month old and not super active so you can pretty much browse down all of the posts all the way back to the start. There is a diversity of discussion regarding from weird trans identities to extreme sexual desires and kinks. And yes, a good percentages of the posts openly talk about being sexually attracted to minors and it is filled with discussions trying to normalize and justify having sex with kids.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, seems like the instance should be generally defederated from if they are fine leaving blatant stuff like that up.