- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
Archived version: https://archive.ph/SPi34
Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20230926153915/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66919358
You must log in or # to comment.
This begs the question: can effective diplomacy be conducted when one of the affected parties isn’t at the table? Is having one party absent better than having one party present but uncooperative?
This is a great book https://archive.org/details/opensocietyitsen0000popp, Karl Popper is the philosopher who described the paradox of intolerance. So applicable today, but unfortunately has been used so much it began to become a meme in itself and lost meaning… He also shred Plato’s republic as proto fascist doctrine, brilliant read/listen
Is having one party absent better than having one party present but uncooperative?
Yes. Because Russia will just derail the conversation if they’re present.
Easy. Just stop ignoring human rights.
I like how they are just trying to normalize all this.
“OH that? Oh, that’s nothing. Don’t worry about it.”
