

Spezifisch die CSU. Es gibt kein Niveau das die nicht unterbieten.
Spezifisch die CSU. Es gibt kein Niveau das die nicht unterbieten.
Not sure where you take the N from. Plus it’s needlessly derogatory. How about FMAGA instead? Because F MAGA!
Wouldn’t that be a great use case for a QR-code?
Well, Wile E. Coyote, no? Road Runner just runs away.
Ist ein schönes Land. Aber die Leute… 🙄
Yes, most times gamescope isn’t required. Thing is, sometimes it is and not having the option is an inconvenience in the best case and makes games unplayable in the worst case.
My partner is currently running PopOS. They somehow managed to combine the chronically outdated Ubuntu packages with a rather counterintuitive UI.
Updates frequently fail, commonly used packages like gamescope aren’t available, overall wouldn’t recommend.
Had it on my Fairphone 4 for a while, but was put off by the very iOS look-and-feel. Ditched it on favour of Lineage.
I get that. But that doesn’t mean you can demand someone else investing a lot of time in what is commonly unpaid work.
Well, you’re free to patch support for your ancient OS back in. But you can’t expect someone else to do it for free.
Nö. Das sind die Regressiven. Was Anderes können die nicht.
Trying to buy back goodwill?
Right? No way this could possibly backfire. Unless, of course, that’s the intended outcome.
Like Silverlight but WASM? Hope it shares the same fate.
Rückständige Bayern tun rückständige-Bayern-Dinge.
Interesting take on the sci-fi horror genre 😁
You don’t? Then why?
I don’t like this type of question. In my experience knowing one language has little impact on learning another. What matters much more is understanding the underlying concepts.
If you grok OOP it doesn’t matter if you go from Java to C# or from C++ to Python. Yes, there are differences, but they’re mostly syntactic in nature.
So assuming you got the hang of imperative programming and maybe had some exposure to functional programming, too, the concept you’re likely to struggle with the most is ownership. Simply because it’s a concept that’s fairly unique to Rust.
Having come from Java, via C++ and Python and having dabbled with Haskell a bit, I feel like The Book does a decent job of explaining Rust in general and its oddities in particular.
Or, and hear me out on this, you could actually learn and understand it yourself! You know? The thing you go to university for?
What would you say if, say, it came to light that an engineer had outsourced the statical analysis of a bridge to some half baked autocomplete? I’d lose any trust in that bridge and respect for that engineer and would hope they’re stripped of their title and held personally responsible.
These things currently are worse than useless, by sometimes being right. It gives people the wrong impression that you can actually rely on them.