These experts on AI are here to help us understand important things about AI.

Who are these generous, helpful experts that the CBC found, you ask?

“Dr. Muhammad Mamdani, vice-president of data science and advanced analytics at Unity Health Toronto”, per LinkedIn a PharmD, who also serves in various AI-associated centres and institutes.

“(Jeff) Macpherson is a director and co-founder at Xagency.AI”, a tech startup which does, uh, lots of stuff with AI (see their wild services page) that appears to have been announced on LinkedIn two months ago. The founders section lists other details apart from J.M.'s “over 7 years in the tech sector” which are interesting to read in light of J.M.'s own LinkedIn page.

Other people making points in this article:

C. L. Polk, award-winning author (of Witchmark).

“Illustrator Martin Deschatelets” whose employment prospects are dimming this year (and who knows a bunch of people in this situation), who per LinkedIn has worked on some nifty things.

“Ottawa economist Armine Yalnizyan”, per LinkedIn a fellow at the Atkinson Foundation who used to work at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

Could the CBC actually seriously not find anybody willing to discuss the actual technology and how it gets its results? This is archetypal hood-welded-shut sort of stuff.

Things I picked out, from article and round table (before the video stopped playing):

Does that Unity Health doctor go back later and check these emergency room intake predictions against actual cases appearing there?

Who is the “we” who have to adapt here?

AI is apparently “something that can tell you how many cows are in the world” (J.M.). Detecting a lack of results validation here again.

“At the end of the day that’s what it’s all for. The efficiency, the productivity, to put profit in all of our pockets”, from J.M.

“You now have the opportunity to become a Prompt Engineer”, from J.M. to the author and illustrator. (It’s worth watching the video to listen to this person.)

Me about the article:

I’m feeling that same underwhelming “is this it” bewilderment again.

Me about the video:

Critical thinking and ethics and “how software products work in practice” classes for everybody in this industry please.

  • sinedpick@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You were asked to give a use-case for LLMs, and with this comes the implicit assumption that it’s not something that can be easily done with a tool that costs about seven orders of magnitude less to produce and operate.

    A bunch of junior devs writing repetitive code because it’s easier or people refusing to learn proper tools because “AI can write my JSON” aren’t exactly good reasons tor the rest of the industry to learn how LLMs work. Don’t get me wrong, there are good reasons, but you’ve not listed any.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You were asked to give a use-case for LLMs

      No, I was asked to give a situation where Copilot was useful. For LLMs, go look at how popular ChatGPT-like tools are for people who aren’t developers, especially RAG-based ones like Bing chat, and tell me they aren’t finding use out of them when companies are literally providing guidance for using them to employees who barely know how to use Excel.

      A bunch of junior devs writing repetitive code because it’s easier or people refusing to learn proper tools because “AI can write my JSON” aren’t exactly good reasons tor the rest of the industry to learn how LLMs work. Don’t get me wrong, there are good reasons, but you’ve not listed any.

      It saved me time in more than one instance. I don’t particularly care what the industry does and never asked the industry to change, but the industry is changing without my input anyway. Clearly I’m not the only one who finds that it increases productivity, and no, sed and vim scripts aren’t going to do the kind of predictive completions that Copilot can do.

      Also, junior devs are going to junior dev regardless of the presence of LLMs. It has always been the responsibility of more senior devs to help them write code correctly. Blaming more junior devs for relying too much on LLMs is just an admission that as a senior dev, you are failing to guide them in the right direction and help them improve.

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For LLMs, go look at how popular ChatGPT-like tools are for people who aren’t developers, especially RAG-based ones like Bing chat, and tell me they aren’t finding use out of them

        the RAG-based bing chat that everyone in my social sphere (especially the non-developers) rags on for giving ridiculously bad answers? what a bizarrely shitty implementation to apparently be obsessed with

        Also, junior devs are going to junior dev

        given that you seem to be resistant to learning how to use an editor for anything more advanced than linear text insertion and seem to think git is “forcing” you to use vim, maybe instead of throwing other junior devs under the bus you should be focusing a bit more on learning your craft? I can guarantee you that all this black box bullshit is an impediment to understanding that your career will be better off without

        and with that, the hour is late, this subthread is too fucking long, and your time posting godawful takes on this instance is coming to a close

        e: oh yeah, I have a link handy for anyone who doesn’t believe my anecdote about how much people fucking hate bing AI

          • self@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m so glad I started adding this shit to Zotero to use as references in future long form articles, cause it turns out it’s also a pretty good bookmark manager

              • self@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                god they fucking would wouldn’t they. flashing back to MDN implementing a bunch of LLM bullshit and the two people responsible for sneaking it into the codebase getting increasingly passive aggressive (in a very cryptobro-reminiscent way) with the hundreds of developers who had a problem with it

                • froztbyte@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  shit what happened with that, I got too busy with life

                  did they just hunker down for a while and hope people would stop being mad? my first suspicion/expectation is that this is what they would do/did

            • froztbyte@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              haha, I was wondering (and planning to ask)

              it’s still an unsolved problem in my life, and none of the solutions or frameworks I’ve come across yet have matched up to my needs. I might be doomed to have to write a software.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        especially RAG-based ones like Bing chat

        @self we’ve got another 'un. and it didn’t even take them that long to go from pretending innocence to mask-off!

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          “copilot isn’t an LLM” followed by “everyone loves bing AI” is a one-two punch of bad takes I admittedly didn’t see coming