db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 months agoThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1247arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1247arrow-down1imageThe Prophetlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square58fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up14·2 months agoThey are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
minus-squareTh4tGuyII@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up18·2 months agoConsidering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
minus-squareo7___o7@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months ago“Decepticons” is right there!
minus-squarefroztbyte@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agowe call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
minus-squareblaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·2 months agoYes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.
They are neat tools, if looked at realistically. They certainly don’t deserve to be called AI. I like to call them High Coherence Media Transformers.
Considering the “hallucinations” I’ve seen, they’re definitely high something haha
“Decepticons” is right there!
we call them autoplag(iarism) machines, much more honest
Yes, that certainly applies to the most popular ones, but not necessarily true for all instances of these technologies.