• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are the customers going to do? Buy from someone else? Wal-Mart is already often the cheapest option around.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s already often the only option around. So many small businesses like local supermarkets and hardware stores got closed down in small towns by Walmart moving in and now there’s no alternative. I see it all over in central Indiana and Illinois.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Less sales but more expensive, so same income, less costs.
        Also less regulations, so they can sell crappier and cheaper alternatives for the same price.
        Also, lower taxes on big corporations.
        And they’ll probably be able to use the private prison system to turn shoplifters into very cheap slave labour, saving on wages.

        Seems like a win-win situation for Walmart, though not so much for its customers.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Buying less, but they’ll be spending the same amount of money, barring rises in other expenses not directly related to tariffs (rent, utilities, etc). Their quality of life will simply go down. Wal-Mart doesn’t care about that. We could all be medieval peasants for all they care.