• clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 个月前

    If we go by the text, only “americans” have that right. Now, the important question is “what is an american”? What characterizes a “non-american” according to the founding fathers?

      • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 个月前

        I don’t doubt that is how the current supreme court would interpret it. This approach of asking “how the founding fathers would think” results in exclusion of non-white citizens. On the other hand, lack of atandardized identification documents in the USA result in this mess.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 个月前

          Are you under the impression that the founding fathers weren’t slave holders themselves?

        • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 个月前

          Also the definition of what the founding fathers had of white was extremely different. It was only people from Britain that were white. The English, Scottish, and Welsh. No one else. Not the Germans, Irish, or Swedes even.

    • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 个月前

      The bill of rights applies to anyone standing on American soil regardless of if they are a citizen, a legal resident, a refugee, or even here “illegally”.

      They have the right to bear arms (per their states laws), they have the right to freedom of speech, assembly and religion, they have the right to due process and protection from unreasonable search and seizure. The constitution doesn’t distinguish citizens from non citizens when it comes to their rights.

      A lot of what trump says he’s gonna do isn’t possible unless the constitution gets suspended. Which is unlikely but not impossible.