• Phoenix3875@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Encouraging. However, there seems to be a question missing in the discussion: why aren’t more people taking the reduced hour offerings?

    According to the report itself, after the first stage of trial, 86% of the working population started to negotiate for reduced hours, of the people surveyed, 51% were offered reduced hours and only 14% took them. It’s an unprecedented large proportion, but still less than one would expect given the benefits. There are other factors preventing people to do so. I hope there will be a follow-up research to find out why.

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      18 days ago

      I think it’s probably like the other commenter said, just money. I think it may be “the other thing”? Where you can have whatever rules and policies in place at the govt level, but if there’s a “work hard / sacrifice for dumb reasons” culture solidly entrenched at work…well, writing’s on the wall. Do that or be soft-ostracized.

      I do think the rules make an impact anywhere there’s a functioning government, just by slowly shifting what people see (accept?) as “normal”.

      • iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        18 days ago

        From the study:

        Between 2015 and 2019, following discussions between public sector employers and trade unions, Iceland saw two major public sector trials of a shorter working week for no loss in pay.