This looks like an excellent source. Thanks OP for posting and trying to fill in the gaps.
About Election Law Blog
Professor Richard L. Hasen is an internationally recognized expert in election law and campaign finance regulation, writing as well in the areas of legislation and statutory interpretation, remedies, and torts. He is co-author of leading casebooks in election law and remedies. Hasen served in 2020 as a CNN Election Law Analyst. He directs UCLA Law’s Safeguarding Democracy Project…. Read full bio on the UCLA Law website.
Yeah. I started reading !electionlawblog@rss.ponder.cat and any time something from it looks extremely interesting, which is a lot of the time, I post it here.
Most times there’s an underlying source I can click through to for the post, but some of it is Hasen’s own stuff, which I post from the blog. But yes, he is a recognized source.
I appreciate you posting in general as well, not just this source. It keeps it lively.
That comma in the title shouldn’t be there. I took the opposite meaning from it.
Well that is good news.
The ECRA got rid of this provision. Moreover, even if a natural disaster massively disrupts the election process in a state, federal law now provides that the solution must be a popular vote that takes place once voting is again possible. The federal law leaves it to state law to determine the proper authorities and procedures to use in these circumstances, which state laws on election emergencies (in those states that have such laws) determines.