“There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”
I just showed that they are lying. You just choose to believe in lies. The actual data from the who contradict the lancet study. And the nature site is so scientific they don’t even provide links to the studies so at least a few people can actually read what is true and what is false.
OK. Let ignore common sense and believe sites with no links to the actual studies. The who is simply lying. The data I provided is from a lancet study called “Temperature-related mortality burden and projected change in 1368 European regions: a modelling study”. I only took the actual number and left out the “model” propaganda.
Also, the owners of nature.com are partners to the WEF, they have pre-defined goals. It is not that they are only interested in science.
You are all dying for an American cause and corrupt local politics if you are Ukrainian. And I am not supporting Russia. There is no good guy here. In the past some countries in Latin America got destroyed be the US for being too friendly with Russia. That is what happens between two powers who want control. The Ukraine war is about arm deals, corruption and money laundering. And I have heard that from an Ukrainian.
It only seems so because they are making things up with models that don’t resemble reality. All you have to do is compare the deaths of similar but warmer countries, and you will find less deaths from cold AND heat. Climate models = Propaganda
They must be pissed. All they can say is love Ukraine, hate Russia. Any other conversaion is banned from their community.
Someone give the news to the jerks at @Ukraine communities.
Is that what they call science now? Speculating about the total number of deaths in the next 84 years? Here are some facts:
“Some 363,500 people die annually from cold, while 43,700 die from excessive heat.” Even if the dooming calculations came true, the deaths from cold will still be considerably higher, and the overall death count lower.
The rest is making things up.
Ai is hyped up autocorrection. All of tem are crap. Openai has been trying to go private, that is why they are making a fuss.
I didn’t express that last part correctly. I meant that it was probably a single guy making those bots. A lot more effective that multiple funders, agencies, organizations and private companies working on “democracy” and “transparency”.
As for the fault. The trouble started with a coup in 2014. Then internal conflict and then Russia entered differently with war. At every step of the conflict you have the US behind. The coup to put a US puppet, arming them, blowing up Russian infrastructure, and using other countries to block Russian gas in favor of more expensive American gas. Russia has made clear they don’t tolerate NATO in Ukraine. It is as logical as Russia putting military bases in Canada or Mexico.
It took time to look that up. The link doesn’t even have an about page. And an IP search shows it is a new site. From there the actual source site (German) you follow back the about pages back to the original sources. There is no need to for a bunch of links. Anyone can verify.
It’s an information war like Hilary Clinton said.
The link goes to a site created less than two months ago kyivinsider. The source is from Alliance4europe.This is part of the DISARM Foundation, also know for AMITT (Adversarial Misinformation and Influence Tactics and Techniques) framework.
That one belongs to the Credibility Coalition, and that one to Meedan. A San Francisco based organization funded by the US National Science Foundation and many organizations like Meta, Amazon, etc.
The Russians are amateurs at propaganda in comparison to the US.
Removed by mod
Openai has been trying to switch for-profit. They must be loving the hype. Now they have an excuse.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
If the consensus was that people are just stupid animals you will also swallow it too. Reality shoes that warmer countries are just fine. People would rather believe what an authority says because it is politically correct, than what a research actually shows. Just like the pandemic, scaring people with made up models to pass predefined policies.