Perfect

Sick fuck

try and conquer *

No they are different.

If Windows becomes a Linux distro that might save their share in normal desktop usage.

So I don’t see it happening.

They don’t care about their users.

That’s not what a shadowban is. A shadow ban is where the user does not know they are banned. These search terms were very obviously censorship and not a shadowban.

If it were a shadowban then you would still get results and be able to interact with it. But some results might have been hidden and your interactions would be hidden to others too. A shadowban is meant to make you believe you were not censored.

Commenting on stuff definitely strengthens it, but I wouldn’t know if a shadow ban changes that. I don’t think there’s much difference if you are shadowbanned or not, you’re still interacting with the content.

The conductor is not the one driving the train. That’s the train driver.

Anyways, I read that almost every driver will eventually experience it. So I guess it’s just part of the job description.

Filter bubbles are the strongest form of propaganda.

Here’s a link to a non gamingonlinux source: https://www.pcguide.com/news/nintendo-switch-2-announcement-is-probably-the-reason-why-steam-deck-sales-just-plummeted/

Oh and it’s already back near the top: https://store.steampowered.com/charts/topsellers

For anybody who ever had this happen, ChatGPT has some solutions to remedy the situation:

(a) Donated or sold to a facility for the purpose of future procedures to fertilize an embryo;

This means it’s legal to pull out and fill a jar to donate to such a facility.

You really want to see this thing everybody talks about?

Paradox of tolerance.

The paradox of tolerance is a philosophical concept suggesting that if a society extends tolerance to those who are intolerant, it risks enabling the eventual dominance of intolerance, thereby undermining the very principle of tolerance.

In a tolerant society we must be intolerant of intolerance.

The official SpongeBob account does not seem to be presenting “backyard does not exist” as a fact, but instead presents “you have not seen the backyard” as a very likely possibility.

Adding the fact to the original post is fine, but nowhere did the original account claim anything that should get a snarky “You might want to delete this account hurr durr” response.

Great stuff.

It would be much better to have a third party examine it and decide who is liable.

Report him?

I think Inxtx meant that there is no numeric value because it depends on the country. Which would be the “chaotic good”. Meaning it’s chaotic but for a good cause.

The link you posted even says that it’s a framework for fair minimum wages within the member countries themselves.

Automatically replace them with xcancel links or something.