• 0 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle




  • Sexuality

    When people talk about “LGBT Pride”, they’re not talking about the “a feeling of deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one’s own achievements” definition, they’re talking about the “confidence and self-respect as expressed by members of a group, typically one that has been socially marginalized” definition.

    It’s almost like words can have more than one meaning.






  • No, it fucking doesn’t and every mouthbreathing moron who parrots this needs to have a long hard look at themselves.

    Ronald McDonald House is a good charity. Pays for parents to stay near their sick kids’ hospital. They do good work.

    Stop trying to discourage people from donating to charity. You’re actively making the world worse through your own ignorance.



  • Sounds like you’re trying to school a highly qualified professional in something that you’ve only just googled 5 minutes ago. I see Lemmy is just like Reddit in that way.

    Nobody is “schooling” anyone, friend. You brought up IP, I attempted to engage with you because I thought you wanted to talk about it. And now you’re crying about nobody can disagree with a “highly qualified professional” and have turned a request for you to share your thoughts and experience into a confrontation.

    just trying to think about sensible policy that’s workable in reality

    That’s literally what I’ve been trying to do. To get you to tell me what you think sensible policy is.

    I think I’m upsetting you, so I’m going to disengage now. Hope your day gets better, mate.


  • Far more fit for purpose than scrapping the concept altogether as this graphic suggests.

    But they are broken though, aren’t they? Like there aren’t any authors going “Oh gee, if I couldn’t guarantee the rights to my works for over half a century after I dead then I’d pack in this writing lark and go and work at the widget factory”.

    You see laws evolve when they are deemed to no longer be fit for purpose, IP laws are constantly reviewed through case law.

    We’re talking about revolution, not evolution. Legislation, not interpretation. I’m asking if you were told to rip out the laws and start again, what would you do? Is that not a more interesting conversation than explaining to me how case law works?

    I mean if you want to play “I work in IP LOL Lefty snowflake tears” then sure. Do that. Hope you have a nice time with it. Seems boring though.


  • Do you think what is essentially “Oooh, I bet that upsets you” is conducive to good faith conversation? Or even just general pleasantness?

    If I asked you “Are you lashing out from fear that you won’t survive the revolution?”, that would be unkind. It would come across as hostile, confrontational and I would be presupposing your own thoughts on society and your relation to it.

    Instead, I’ll engage with you as close to your own terms as I’m able: Do you think your country’s intellectual property laws are fit for purpose?



  • the_inebriati@lemmy.mltoMemes@lemmy.mlJesus and Capitalists
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Adding on to this.

    Oppression of the Poor and Injustice to the Wage Earner are two of the four Sins that Cry to Heaven for Vengeance.

    Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you.

    Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are motheaten.

    Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.

    Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth.

    Jimmy’s 5th chapter.