• 15 Posts
  • 72 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2025

help-circle


  • s@piefed.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHow sad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I wasn’t sure if this was misinformed satire or satire of misinformed satire, but looking at OP’s profile shows they really don’t have any comprehension of reality or morality. Or their ardent and constant defense of the indefensible and provocative, especially in places wherein it would be coldly received, could theoretically be an intentional provocation by a larger maligned entity that seeks to promote deceptive and derisive propaganda. Theoretically. Or they could be an out of touch individual. Theoretically.


  • Much of the US is not dense, so many people have to drive to get places. In my experience, most areas don’t have the infrastructure for cars + pedestrians + cyclists, let alone just cars + pedestrians. The few places that do intermingle all three do so in a way which is very overwhelming for drivers. Cyclists also tend to travel either too slow for cars to maneuver around or too fast for cars to notice them coming. Like motorcycles, their small size also makes them hard to notice or keep track of while driving, and they don’t make the volume of noise that motorcycles do which helps with noticing them.











  • On social media like Reddit, unnecessary censorship is often used as engagement bait. As far as I am aware, comments on the Threadiverse (a broader term than just “Lemmy”) only boosts posts upward in the Active category rather than in the Hot category, so that form of engagement bait uniquely does not really work here. Additionally, bots on Reddit would repost (either from old Reddit posts or directly from the source social medium) screenshots of tweets with the username edited to a different user, sometimes even celebrities, to bypass image recognition filters.

    In my mind, it’s always best to cite your source if you can. However, if you can separate the self-focused fluff (if there is any) from the actual content, that would be even better. An example of this is a screenshot of a TikTok with a paragraph of soapbox text located near the content creator’s face; we don’t need the excess focus on the clout-chasing, so cropping the image to just their paragraph (assuming it is an original quote) and citing the creator would be better in that case.

    On another sidenote, unlike Reddit, you can edit your posts here to change the image in the post.



  • Do you have links to any examples? I can’t say I’ve seen a whole lot of what you’re describing apart from a few isolated posts or comments here or there. I’d suggest checking to see if a significant portion of these posts are coming from a specific community or from a specific instance, and then adjusting your blocks to accommodate.

    P.S. Since we’re on the topic, I’m not a bot; I just talk and write like this.

    P.P.S. That’s not entirely true. I would have written “I’m not a bot—I just talk and write like this.” but it didn’t seem like an appropriate time to use an em dash.

    Edit: after looking through OP’s profile and seeing a couple of apparently AI-generated posts, I’m starting to think that this post is also AI-generated or that OP has some weird false flag-esque agendum that they’re up to

    Edit 2: the banner picture on their profile literally reads “LLM❤️”. They are a troll spam account.